(With the name removed to make things interesting...but those who know...know)
"...is adopting a "literalistic" reading of the Bible when he takes Paul's 2,000-year-old words as proof for all time that the Supreme Being --!(#%&#)@*$(&%--.
"It's the same process of logic that leads to supporting slavery," -$*@$&%- said, noting that the apostle of Jesus also did not oppose slavery.
"It's important for people to understand that the holy scriptures is a very nuanced document. I think we need to allow people room to come to a new understanding,"
Not applicable for all time, same process that leads us to supporting slavery.
Question: is this an egalitarian supporting women in the pulpit? Or an Anglican supporting homosexual marriage?