Book Review – “Forgotten God”

Forgotten God” by Francis Chan

This is a pretty basic book and Chan tells that right up front.  It is not so much that we don’t know about the Holy Spirit, it’s more like…we don’t acknowledge Him – we don’t live like His presence is a reality in our lives.

And that is the message of this book

Many times we are discouraged from being too passionate, or too giving, or too…whatever.  Do not let others discourage us from following the leading of the Spirit.

As I was finishing the book; reading the last few pages, this struck me

Galatians 5:22
But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness…

Did you catch that?  I never have.

Fruit…singular.  One Spirit, one fruit, many flavors.

Posted in Book Reviews, Book, , Movie, Music, and Television Reviews | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Book Review – “Everybody Here Spoke Sign Language”

Everybody Here Spoke Sign Language” by Nora Ellen Groce

It was a good book, but a little “text-bookish” – a lot of research went into it and the author talked to the last living people who knew some of the deaf people on Martha’s Vineyard.

Way back when…when Martha’s Vineyard was first settled by people from England, they brought with them a recessive gene for deafness.  At one point, the deaf population (percentage wise) was several times the rate of deafness in the population of the rest of the country.

The deaf on Martha’s Vineyard weren’t considered “handicapped” – they just…were.  Groce tells several stories of interviewing people and asking about a certain person.  The interviewee would say, “oh!  they owned a boat and they were really good fishermen” and it was only when specifically asked did the person remember, “well, yes.  Come to think of it, they were deaf!”

It seems that nearly every family had at least one child and every learned sign language, both hearing and deaf.   For a couple of centuries, deafness was about as much of a handicap on the island as being left-handed.  It wasn’t.

Today, deaf people tend to marry deaf people – that wasn’t the way it was on Martha’s Vineyard.  It was only when “deaf schools” started to be opened on the mainland and people in general became more mobile, that the deaf population on the island started to dwindle.  As people moved off island and to the island, the gene pool expanded.

It was only in the mid-20th century that the person with this hereditary deafness died – from the 1600′s until the 1900′s, deafness was a part of every day life – I liked reading that.

What we see as an impairment – wasn’t.  Today, deaf people are sometimes treated as though, because they cannot here, they cannot understand.  There…and then, it was the off-islanders who were at a disadvantage, because they didn’t understand some of what was being said in sign.

It was the Martha’s Vineyard sign language that became the basis for ASL.

If you have an interest in deafness or sign language…or if you just want the encouragement of reading about an “impairment” wasn’t, this is a good book to read.

Posted in Book Reviews, Book, , Movie, Music, and Television Reviews | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Just a note…

all these years and anniversaries are still the pits.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Move…

is not going well.  Tom is going to make me crazy.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

QOTD

> I keep wavering between giving you a straight answer and giving my forehead some keyboard.

Just so I remember it.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Oh…so sad…

Posted in Humor, Technology | Tagged | Leave a comment

More on the Apartment

The landlord (Ron) told me that (as long as I told him ahead of time) I could do “stuff” to the unit. But whatever I leave behind when I move out is his.

If I end up being there for a while, there are a few things I would do.

  • more cable jacks – okay, that’s a given and I’m calling tomorrow to get that done.
  • install these (and the rail)
  • a wireless intercom for the door
  • maybe a ceiling fan or two
  • this (for the door to the balcony)

If I do one of these every few months, it will make the place more comfy.

Things that I might buy that I could pass along to somebody else

  • this (for the balcony)
  • this (to make life easier)- which could double as a portable island.

I share the job of shoveling the sidewalk with the downstairs tenant – I have an electric snowblower, but have no storage.  If they want to store it (and use it) I’ll gladly provide it.

The other thing is that I’m responsible for my own garbage removal – I just don’t generate that much garbage, so I may end up volunteering to pay for a cart and removal, rather than buying “blue garbage bags” –  our city’s system.  You buy the bag and put in on the curb on the right day, and they pick it up.  If I go with a private service, maybe I can split the cost and store the cart outdoors so I don’t have to keep garbage in the apartment for a week.

If I keep the camping gear in the camper, that will take care of that storage need – I just need to put a good padlock on the camper door.

My books always suffer from lack of organization…my thought was to get these binder clips in white to stick on the shelves and label them with a sharpie

I need more bookshelves.

Posted in Life | Tagged , | 4 Comments

Biblical Case for an Old Earth

A Biblical Case for an Old Earth by David Snoke

Previous chapters here.

Chapter 2.

One of the complaints about the book in the Amazon reviews is that the book is supposed to be about the Biblical case, yet he starts with the scientific case.

The first sentence of this chapter says,

My goal is to build a biblical case, not primarily a scientific one, but I want to first review some of the scientific facts so that we can see the stakes involved.

This seems fair to me.  How can we build a Biblical case for an old earth unless we know what “old earth” entails?

The first topic is measuring the age of the universe by the distance of the stars

  • First, one could argue that the above (read the book) measurement process is wrong, and that actually the stars are much nearer.
  • Second, one could argue that the speed of light used to be much faster
  • Third, one could argue that the light we see did not actually come from stars, but was created “en route.

The problem with the first argument is that (if the universe is no more than 10,000 years old, then all of the stars would have to be within 10,000 light years of the view point (earth).  There are billions of stars and to have them all within 20,000 light years of each other (with earth at the center) would create gravitational chaos.

The second argument (the slowing down of the speed of light) is more interesting…but…

One of the books I’m reading now is “The Singularity is Near” by Ray Kurzweil. On page 140 (a wild paraphrase) he writes that two physicists from Los Alamos Laboratory have discovered the remains on a natural nuclear reactor in West Africa that had a “melt down” 2 billion years ago.  There is a “constant particle” called an “alpha particle” that is inversely related to the speed of light and by examining isotopes connected with these particles, the slowing of the alphas implies that the speed of light has INCREASED. This is a minuscule change – 4.5 parts per 10 to the 38th power (no clue how to do exponents in wordpress).

The third argument (that light was created en route) is – according to Snoke – the most viable of the three.  But if we work under the assumption that things are as they appear, then the starts appear to be very far away.

This “apparent age” theory eliminates any possibility of a scientific discussion about the age of the world.

That’s it for the “speed of light changing” and there’s more in chapter 1…but I wanted to get this posted today… 

Posted in Book Reviews, Book, , Movie, Music, and Television Reviews, Christianity | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

I want this (almost) wordless Wednesday

Okay…maybe I just want a little bit of his (her?) hair.  Yak fiber is very soft, but a little out of my range at $36 for a 2 oz. skein.  I’ll stick with my alpaca for now.

Posted in Crafting | Tagged , | Leave a comment

NOT good for the diet…

but very tasty.

Posted in Adult Indulgences, wine | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Substantive Norms

From the Vatican:

1° With due regard for can. 1378 of the Code of Canon Law, both the one who attempts to confer sacred ordination on a woman, and she who attempts to receive sacred ordination, incurs a  latae sententiae excommunication reserved to the Apostolic See.

and

§ 1. The more grave delicts against morals which are reserved to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith are:

1° the delict against the sixth commandment of the Decalogue committed by a cleric with a minor below the age of eighteen years; in this case, a person who habitually lacks the use of reason is to be considered equivalent to a minor.

2° the acquisition, possession, or distribution by a cleric of pornographic images of minors under the age of fourteen, for purposes of sexual gratification, by whatever means or using whatever technology;

§ 2. A cleric who commits the delicts mentioned above in § 1 is to be punished according to the gravity of his crime, not excluding dismissal or deposition.

On first glance, it would seem as though the Vatican is reserving the more severe punishment for ordaining women, rather than child rape.

I think I see it a little bit differently.  With this wording, Rome has the opportunity to deal with both of these issues in a right way…whether that happens remains to be seen, since they don’t exactly have the greatest track record of dealing with pedophiles.

The first (ordaining of women) is punishable with excommunication.  ”We’re done, you’re gone, it’s over.”  The people involved are no longer under the authority of Rome and Rome has no hold over them, spiritually or earthly.

The second (sex with a minor) may be punishable with defrocking and being turned over to the secular authorities.  This means that there will be earthly consequences (prison, perhaps) and they may no longer be in a leadership position within the church.

This also means that (unlike excommunication) they are still under the authority of Rome, which means that the Vatican can have some direction and it leaves the door open for repentance…penance…forgiveness…restoration.

To me, keeping these offenders under the authority of Rome keeps them accountable…and keeps Rome accountable.

Posted in Christian Denominations, Roman Catholic | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The New Apartment

Is set up a little differently than I remember, but will be nice.

It’s an upper, so there are stairs up that don’t go anyplace but my unit.  There’s a deadbolt both at the bottom of the stairs and the top of the stairs.  What this means is that I can put bike hoods on the walls of the stairs (it’s wide enough in two places) and use the hall for bike storage (and I ran it by the landlord and he said ok.)

The bedrooms are a little bigger than I remember, so furniture will fit.  One of my dressers will be in the “front room” – and since I use it for office and craft storage, it’s a better place for it anyway.

Plenty of wall space for bookshelves…I need to get comcast out to put in another cable jack.

Lots of kitchen storage, plenty of drawers.  I still have to shovel snow, but I share the duty with the downstairs folks.  I can even park the camper on the property and this is the first landlord who has said “yes” to that.

I’ll have to get a little creative with storage, especially camping gear.  I’m going to have a padlock put on the camper door and I can keep most of the gear in there.

Overall, it will work well.

Posted in Life | Tagged , | Leave a comment

A Biblical Case for an Old Earth – book review

Preface and Chapter 1

I’ll link to this up as I add chapters – it’s a good book that gives a different side to the “evolution vs. 6-day creation” debate.

Biblical Case For an Old Earth” by David Snokes (if you buy through this link, I get a credit – hint, hint)

In the preface,

Snokes introduces the debate in a “orthodox vs liberalism” sort of way and describes how “old earthers” are often portrayed by  those who believe that the earth is (at most) 20,000 years old.

Snokes maintains that a person can be a theological conservative and accept a Biblical case for an old earth.

Chapter 1, “Starting Assumptions”

Snokes starts by telling readers that if he had not studied science, he would not have come to an old earth conclusion…tells us that his interpretation is a “possible” interpretation, not an “obvious” one.  He recognizes that his view may not be popular, and points out that:

It is illegitimate to change our view of the Bible because we want a more popular interpretation.

and then

He poses the question about whether or not it’s okay to ever allow experience, history, or science affect or alter our understanding of the interpretation of Scripture.

Examples he used were Galileo…do we allow our understanding of science to affect our interpretation of Psalm 93:1?

Does history tell us that “king” in Daniel 5:1 refers to a viceroy, a “lesser king”, and not the foremost ruler of an entire country?  Would we have that understanding, if we didn’t have history?

There is a legitimacy to allowing experience to affect our interpretation…that does NOT mean that we should change our interpretation to bow to the prevailing views of culture in order to be with the “in crowd.”  It also does not mean that we need to get onto the “slippery slope” and we can avoid that by clearly laying out the boundaries – what is negotiable and what is not.

we would do well to remember that science was founded by Christians who insisted that God is not a great deceiver, that the natural world is ordered by a good God, and that we must reject superstition and hearsay; moreover, that we must subject all truth claims to rigorous examination, even claims of honored church leaders from generations past…

Question: is it legitimate to allow your experience with purported miracle workers to affect the way you interpret passages like Ephesians 4:11 AND 2 Cor. 12:12 that seem to promise signs and wonders?

My answer…maybe not, but it is certainly wise to allow Scripture to judge whether or not a miracle worker is merely “purported.”

Posted in Book Reviews, Book, , Movie, Music, and Television Reviews | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Bailey’s Replacement Therapy.

Posted in Adult Indulgences, wine | Tagged | Leave a comment

Batteries…

Posted in Humor | Tagged | Leave a comment

The Wages of Sin…the “T”

(this post is “recycled” while I update categories)

Therefore, just as sin came into the world through one man, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men because all sinned— (Romans 5:12 ESV)

This is not a “Federal Headship” post. This verse does not say because one man sinned, we are all guilty of his sin…it says “all sinned”

We are all touched by death; all of us have known somebody who has died. Some of us have had a very close loved one leave this earth. For some of us, we have the comfort of knowing that we will see them again. Others of us do not have that comfort.

It is not “life” that gives us death.

It is SIN that gives us death

“and, you know, we all will probably die with something sooner or later…” (former Surgeon General Joycelyn Elders)

Yes…we all will “probably” die. All of us that are walking on this earth right now are mortal…we will die

That is the “T”. The Total Depravity that touches all of our lives.

The “T” is important because it makes the problem crystal clear. All have sinned.

But now the righteousness of God has been manifested apart from the law, although the Law and the Prophets bear witness to it— the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ for all who believe. For there is no distinction: for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, and are justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, whom God put forward as a propitiation by his blood, to be received by faith. This was to show God’s righteousness, because in< his divine forbearance he had passed over former sins. It was to show his righteousness at the present time, so that he might be just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus. (Romans 3:21-26 ESV)

Without the “T”, the need for a Saviour is not so clear. Without the Saviour, the “T” brings hopelessness.

But we do have the “T”, we do need a Saviour and we do HAVE a Saviour.

We have hope…

For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast. (Eph. 2:8-9 ESV)

The “T” makes us understand that we are so steeped in sin that there is nothing we can do to merit our salvation.

The hope is in Christ and in Christ alone. It is by grace, through faith, not of works.

We have all become like one who is unclean,
and all our righteous deeds are like a polluted garment.
We all fade like a leaf,
and our iniquities, like the wind, take us away.
There is no one who calls upon your name,
who rouses himself to take hold of you;
for you have hidden your face from us,
and have made us melt in the hand of our iniquities.(ISA 64: 6-7 ESV)

It is only in our understanding of our need for the Saviour that we are able to reach out for salvation.

Posted in Reformed Theology, TULIP | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The “Divorce Sacrament” (next installment)

On another site, a while ago so I don’t have the link, somebody was saying that a couple was getting married and one of them had been divorced – she was having a problem with that because there was no way that she could be sure (as part of the congregation) that the couple could Biblically marry.

And did not trust the church leadership to have the discernment to make that call.  I think what the person wanted was for the divorced person to stand up in front of the congregation and explain why they were divorced and make a justification (in front of the congregation) to remarry.

My feeling at the time (and still is) -

  • if that person had sinned and repented, it’s none of my business, it’s between them and God.  If the church leadership knows the story, that’s good enough for me.
  • If the person had NOT sinned, it’s none of my business, it’s between them and God.  If the church leadership knows the story, that’s good enough for me.
  • If I don’t trust my church leadership to make the call, it’s time to look for another church.

If I NEED to know the “back story” about a couple who is getting married, I need to check my own heart for the potential of gossip and holding repented of sin against a person that isn’t even liable to me to start with.

That said:

I also thought at the time that if there was a process within a denomination (somewhat like annulment, but realistically looking at the cause of the divorce)…and issuing a certificate by the church board stating that they had worked with this person through the divorce and found them to be free to remarry, it would (I think) leave a lot fewer headaches and heartaches for a divorced person who wants to carry on with their life.

There is seldom only one “guilty party” in a divorce – and a discerning church board would know this.  If a person has committed “porneia” and repented – wanting to stay married and is committed to faithfulness from that point forward…and the spouse refuses to forgive…

that puts the unforgiving spouse in the position of being the “guilty party.”  A repentant person is then held hostage by the sin of their spouse who is divorcing them.

Many divorces are so confused and convoluted that it would truly take a mature and discerning board to sort things out.

I’m not suggesting a “divorce sacrament” – but rather a system by which a board or church leader (trained in counseling) could work through the repentance process (since there is rarely only one guilty party) or the divorce process (if truly innocent) and issue a certificate or letter that the person could carry to their next church (if there is a next church) that verifies to the pastor that church leadership has overseen the situation or process and found the person Biblically able to remarry (and that would vary by denomination.)

We stand before the church and say “we are getting married in the eyes of the Lord.”

Why not stand before the church and say, “this union is Biblically dissolved?”

Posted in Christian Issues, Christianity, Issues Etc., divorce and remarriage, podcast | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

My Reading List…

I read one “program” that had 6 or 7 basic genres…and left out a few of my favorites.  I’m either going to have to combine in order to keep my reading varied but focused…or add more genres.

Posted in Reading Plan | Tagged | Leave a comment

Fit Friday

It was a sucky week.  ”Nuff said.

Posted in Blogging Events, fit friday | Tagged | Leave a comment

The Sacrament of Divorce?!?!?

I was listening to Issues, etc. (podcast from last week) and the guest (a very regular guest) Dr. Jennifer Roback Morse reacted in horror when host Todd Wilken talked about the Episcopal Church having a ceremony to “celebrate” divorce.

One of the things I’ve contemplated when studying divorce and remarriage in the church has been how to communicate to the congregation that a member who is (or in the process of becoming) divorced has been before the elders and is deemed by the church to have the right to remarry?

  1. the Episcopal Church does not call it a “sacrament”
  2. there is a point at which this sort of ceremony would be useful
  3. there is an emotional healing that takes place when a person can stand before a church congregation and have them know that the church leadership is standing with them.

The Roman Catholic Church has the annulment process, by which a marriage (no matter how long it has lasted or how many children it has brought into this world) is declared “not a marriage” to the church.  It does not deny that the marriage existed legally, but rather that – even if a priest presided over and blessed the vows – the marriage never existed in the eyes of the church because – in the hearts of the couple, or one or the other of the couple – it was not a sacramental marriage.

I disagree with this because one (or both) of the people involved may have very much made the covenant vows before God and man, and the heart was very much in line with what God intended marriage to be.   People sin.  I can come up with a couple of examples of how “annulment”  may not be fair to one party.

Just one…a man enters a marriage with the intent to stand before God and man and love her as Christ loves the church until they day one of them breathes no more.  She decides that she’d rather not be married and leaves…and then gets an annulment so she can get married in her parents’ church.  The husband is left – after taking vows that meant the world to him and that HE kept…and knowing that those vows meant nothing in the eyes of the church, since the church just told him that marriage never existed in their eyes.

To tell a person who wanted to stay married that their vows were not sacramental, leaves them at the mercy of the spiritual life of their ex-spouse.

Where Rome gets it right:  The certificate of annulment comes with an assumption that the parties of the divorce have the Biblical right to remarry.

more in another post…

Posted in Christian Issues, divorce and remarriage | Tagged , | 6 Comments