my term paper needs to get started at some point (very soon)
I'm in Marquette until tomorrow morning, but have a few hours on my hands right now.
Question: work on my paper? Or go hiking?
okay...(edit)...
MUST...WORK...ON...PAPER...
my term paper needs to get started at some point (very soon)
I'm in Marquette until tomorrow morning, but have a few hours on my hands right now.
Question: work on my paper? Or go hiking?
okay...(edit)...
MUST...WORK...ON...PAPER...
Message to the Sick; Pope John Paul II
Pope John Paul II gave his “Message to the Sick” in 1999, in Mexico. Diagnosed in 1996 with Parkinson’s disease, he did not write words of mere platitudes, he wrote with real meaning in his life. He would have had a taste of the progression of his own illness and the words were borne out of his own painful experience.
The pope’s questions, “Why do we suffer? For what purpose do we suffer? Is there any meaning in human suffering? Can physical or moral suffering be a positive experience?” were not rhetorical for him…he asked real questions and they had real meaning in his life.
This man, the most visible religious figure on the planet, did not hide from life or to live a life of complaint…his suffering pointed him to the basis of his faith – Christ, who died for the sins of the world, was now with His servant who suffered.
Each person who suffers, whether physical pain, or emotional or mental, has the opportunity to use their suffering in positive ways, or to wallow in negativity. The pope chose the positive, ever pointing to the source of his hope.
A man, dying of cancer, had spent years turning away from God. He found hope in the Psalms of David and turned to Christ in the last days of his life. When he wrote his own funeral, it pointed others to the source of his hope. After that funeral, his widow found comfort in the message that her brother, who had also spent years in rebellion, had returned to the church because of the way her husband’s suffering had pointed to Christ.
That widow looks back at life, seeing years of infertility, the losses of pregnancies and the pain of her premature child…she finds comfort in the knowledge that beyond the grave, there is peace and fullness of life. She understands now that she would not have the strength and compassion if she had not felt the suffering in her life.
Pope John Paul had a greater understanding than most people – when we suffer, we partake in the sufferings of Christ. He died in April, 2005 – 12 years after his diagnosis. He spent those years pointing others to the source of his hope.
It is in this pointing to Christ that we find meaning of pain and suffering in our human existence.
With these thoughts, I have wanted to arouse in each one of you the feelings which will lead you to live your current trials with supernatural sense; discovering in them an occasion to see God in the midst of darkness and doubt; and to gaze at the broad horizons which are visible from atop the crosses of our everyday lives – Pope John Paul II, January 24, 1999
Discuss whether you see a way around exclusivism, pluralism, and inclusivism that might still keep integrity of each particular religion in place. Discuss how religious language might or might not play a role in your conclusion.
Exclusivism (the doctrine that only one religion is “true”) is the foundation of many religions. If Scripture is correct, “Out of the abundance of the heart, the mouth speaks.” Whatever a person believes passionately will come out of his or her mouth. People who believe that their belief system has the only means to salvation; if they believe that souls depend on the truth of that system, that belief will be shared with others. They can fully respect the dignity of other people, and understand the depth of the beliefs of others; they want to share the truth so that all will come to salvation. One can “witness” or “evangelize” by simply stating one’s belief, while allowing others to share their own beliefs in the same way.
Inclusivism may be compatible with exclusivism, in that (in Christianity, for example) inclusivism maintains that Jesus Christ is the only means of salvation, but salvation (through Christ) can be obtained without a specific belief in Christ for salvation, but through the “general revelation” of nature. People who embrace inclusivism have an understanding that people who have never heard the gospel of Christ, may (through general revelation) may come to a saving faith without ever hearing of Christ).
Pluralism maintains that all religions are equally valid and that any religion may bring a person to salvation. This cannot be compatible with exclusivism (within a person) but may coincide with inclusivism. Once cannot simultaneously believe that there is only one means of salvation and believe that there are many ways to salvation.
Within a group of people, discussions can take place that allow sharing and debates of beliefs. These discussions can get passionate and even heated at times, and they depend on the ability of others to present their convictions and listen to other people and maintain respect and civility for the other people, even if they do not respect the other religion. If respect and civility are not present, the “doctrine of ‘just shut up’” might come into play.
I'm odd. The two classes this semester...GOODIE! I get to do research papers!
10 pages each for the finals - one on the Philosophy of Religion and the other on a subject of Deafness.
Possible - linguistic development of deaf children (including brain scans on the language center of the brain) or the development of accommodation technology.
On the other hand..."the problem of evil" or "free will."
I'm seriously considering dropping the drawing class.
I'm enjoying the challenge and I like the work that I'm doing.
But I'm overwhelmed and not doing well. I'm behind everywhere. I may drop the class now, finish well in Art for the Elementary Classroom and pick up the drawing again in January.
I need to decide quickly (this weekend).
I've given myself "permission to fail" one of my classes. It's the "fun" one (it really is).
I'm overwhelmed with everything (due to things that only a few folks know or need to know) and I bit off way more than I could chew this semester.
So if I blow off homework (and I did), and still learn and enjoy the class...so?
Two point perspective...
just...I started to draw a hallway with a junction...did not turn out well.
After 3 hours I moved. I now have only one class plus a little bit to draw a detailed thumbnail and complete the "interior space" drawing.
My organization got knocked of kilter really, really fast this semester. The only thing I'm sort of caught up on is the drawing that we need to do in class (and I need to go to class early on Monday to get it done).
I have a panel due on Thursday (3 small projects on a poster board) that will be quite fun, but will take time.
On Wednesday I have my still life due and I have a lot of work to do on that.
I'm struggling in drawing class and can't pin down why. I can draw the structure, but I don't seem to see all of the little highlights of light and shadows and reflections that everybody else seems to see. I'm not sure if it's because my contacts are thicker and cut down glare or if my eyes are just that bad.
My husband's sisters, Deb and Judy are still close to me and have been very good to us.
Today, Judy gave Tom as college send off (iPod cover and many $ of iTunes gift cards, all the linen needed to set up a dorm room and a check for $500...)
Deb...
(the Nisson behind them)
THANK YOU ALL! (Tom is being rewarded for his good choices...)
yes...I am spoiled! I'm posting from my iPod touch from Schuler's. Free wireless and an iPod....
Ah...this may the first semester my kids get a better Gpa than I do...